Official test result in Korea
TBK-2023-007179
※ Appendix. Measurement details.
1. Test information.

1) Test date: 09/20/2023
2) Test location: Vacant lot, 30 Bangbaejungang- ro , Seocho-gu, seoul
3) Testing equipment: Development prototype (attached to vehicle in band form)
4) Tester: Korea Testing & Research Institute Jong Hoon Lee.
5) Measuring equipment: Exhaust gas automatic measuring device.
6) Reference: Tested in the air pollution process test standards under the conditions set up by client.
2. Test method provided by the client.

1) Turn on the engine and stabilize the client’s car.
2) The emitted exhaust gas was measured with an exhaust gas measuring instrument, while idling maximum rpm (approximately 4000) for 2 minutes.
3) Turn off the car’s engine for 4 minutes and restart the car to stabilize engine.
4) Repeat number two to three 5 times.
5) Install the development prototype on the client’s car and proceed step one to four equally.
3. Test result.



Accurate measurement report
of the O2 BAND
(Before & After about effectiveness in O2 BAND)
Self-inspection / Test about how O2 BAND affects on the car
Introduction
This is an experimental report to measure the effectiveness of O2 BAND.
This is a report that shows the results of the positive changes in engine combustion when O2 BAND was on detached.
We categorized the process as four.

1. Exhaust Gas component measurement.
2. Exhaust measurement.
3. Measurement of the engine vibration.
4. Fuel efficiency change measurement


The purpose of this test is to check the performance of O2 BAND and compare the changes in Exhaust gas components with four categories.
Summary
This report summarizes the results of the four test measurements on the introduction.The measurement values are summarized as follows.
1. ( Fuel efficiency measurement )
Total 3 vehicles were used on the test. Tester tested approximately 15 km or more and compared fuel efficiency value.
(Test circumstance proceeded unequipped/equipped O2 BAND.)
The table below shows the change of fuel efficiency (unequipped/equipped) of the O2 BAND.
As the test showed, an average of 45.9% was increased when the O2 BAND was installed.
Although there were differences between each vehicle, we can see fuel efficiency improved when O2 BAND was installed.
2. ( Exhaust gas composition measurement )
Tester measured exhaust gas composition of value change depending on O2 BAND were equipped/unequipped.
The average value data was calculated by 6 cycles (12 times). Based on two test methods.
Tester measured exhaust gas composition of value change depending on O2 BAND were equipped/unequipped.
The table of average values are on the table below.
- O2 BAND equipped -> The average exhaust gas component values
CO : -19.74% NOX : -70.41% SO2 : -22.78%

- O2 BAND unequipped -> The average exhaust gas component values.
CO : +17.31% NOX : +71.43% SO2 : +51.44
3. Exhaust measurement
- Tester measured exhaust gas composition of value change depending on O2 BAND were equipped/unequipped.
- Exhaust values were measured at certified automobile inspection laboratory. (LUG-DOWN 3)
- Result that measured diesel vehicle without O2 BAND installed,
Mode 1 : 22%
Mode 2 : 13%
Mode 3 : 10%

- Result that measured diesel after O2 BAND installed,
Mode 1 : 15%
Mode 2 : 13%
Mode 3 : 3%
Total average
About 34% exhaust measurement was reduced.
4. Measurement of vibration value change
Tester measured vibration value change of engine, depending on O2 BAND were equipped/unequipped.
- The vibration value of the engine showed about 34% changing value.
- Although there were differences between each test because of environmental factors, we can check O2 BAND affects the vibration value of the engine.
1. Fuel efficiency measurement test
A specific route was set in order to check how O2 BAND affects fuel efficiency.
*Fuel efficiency and CO2 emissions have same connection. Carbon dioxide has a 99.9% correlation with fuel efficiency. Vehicles with high fuel efficiency emit less carbon dioxide.
● Test car_A
[Chevrolet XM3]
Year : 2022
Gasoline engine I4 naturally aspirated
Engine displacement volume : 1,598cc
Horsepower : 123hp
Maximum torque : 15.8kg.m
Unladen weight : 1,300kg
Front wheel drive
○ Test route
Starting point : Bangbae-dong seocho-gu
Destination : Chang-dong dobong-gu, Seoul
Total distance : About 27km
Travel time : On the way 40~50 minutes
Coming back : 50~60 minutes
· Test_A (XM3)
- Measurement date : 09/12/2023
- Air temperature : 28.9°C
- Atmospheric humidity : 67%
- Trip time : On the way 13:38 ~ 14:22 / Way back 14:26 ~ 15:30
- Measurement Method : O2 BAND unequipped.
· Test_B (XM3)
- Measurement date : 09/14/2023
- Air temperature : 28.2°C
- Atmospheric humidity : 64%
- Trip time : On the way 13:34 ~ 14:18 / Way back 14:20 ~ 15:15
- Measurement Method : O2 BAND equipped
● Test Vehicle_B
[Chrysler 300c]
Year : 2010
Gasoline engine V6 DOHC
Engine displacement volume : 2,736cc
Horsepower : 193 hp
Maximum torque : 26kg.m
Unladen weight : 1,805kg
Rear wheel drive
○ Test route
Starting point : Bangbae-dong seocho-gu
Destination : Naeson-dong, Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi-do
Total distance : About 14km
Travel time : On the way 30~40 minutes / Way back : 40~50 minutes
· Test_A (300C)
- Measurement date : On the way 07/24/2023 | Way back 07/25/2023
- Air temperature : 27.7°C
- Atmospheric humidity : 95%
- Trip time : On the way 18:57 ~ 19:37 Way back 20:51 ~ 21:31
- Measurement Method : O2 BAND unequipped
· Test_B (300C)
- Measurement date : On the way 07/25/2023 | Way back 07/26/2023
- Air temperature : 28.4°C
- Atmospheric humidity : 93%
- Trip time : On the way 19:02 ~ 19:39 / Way back 20:50 ~ 21:31
- Measurement method : O2 BAND equipped
● Test vehicle_C
[BMW Z4 M40i]
Year : 2021
Gasoline engine I6
Engine displacement volume : 2,998cc
Horsepower : 387 hp
Maximum torque : 50.9kg.m
Unladen weight : 1,610kg
Rear wheel drive
○ Test route
Starting point : Bangbae-dong seocho-gu
Destination : Mokdong, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul
Total distance : 16km
Travel time : On the way 30~40 minutes / Wayback 40~50 minutes
· Test_A (Z4)
- Measurement date : On the way 09/18/2023 | Way back 09/19/2023 - Air temperature : 28.4°C - Atmospheric humidity : 93% - Trip time : On the way 15:41 ~ 16:22 / Way back 18:41 ~ 19:19 - Measurement method : O2 BAND equipped
· Test_B (Z4)
- Measurement date : On the way 09/20/2023 | Way back 09/21/2023 - Air temperature : 20.1°C - Atmospheric humidity : 97% - Trip time : On the way 14:02 ~ 14:46 / Way back 19:11 ~ 19:53 - Measurement method : O2 BAND unequipped
● Result
· XM3 Fuel efficiency test result
Based on the same trip route, fuel efficiency increased 35.2% and 40.2% depending on whether O2 BAND were equipped/unequipped.

On average, about 37.7% of fuel efficiency was increased.
· 300C Fuel efficiency test result
Based on the same trip route, fuel efficiency increased 17.7% and 35.9% depending on whether O2 BAND were equipped/unequipped.

On average, about 26.8% of fuel efficiency was increased.
· Z4 Fuel efficiency test result
Based on the same trip route, fuel efficiency increased 64.7% and 81.9% depending on whether O2 BAND were equipped/unequipped.
· Although there were differences between each test because of different cars and different engine systems, we can check that O2 BAND helps to increase the fuel efficiency of the vehicle.
2. Exhaust gas component measurement test
(*KTR Korea certification institute test results in progress )
Test was conducted to measure exhaust gas composition before/after installation of O2 BAND.
The purpose of the test is to check the performance of O2 BAND and compare the changes in Exhaust gas components.
● Test equipment
[Ecom-MK 3000]
Measuring items (O2, CO, CO2, NO1, NO2, NOx, SO2, gas temperature, gas pressure, air temperature, low rate)
● Test car
[Chrysler 300c]
Year : 2010
Gasoline engine : V6 DOHC
Engine displacement volume : 2,736cc
Horsepower : 193 hp
Maximum torque : 26kg.m
Unladen weight : 1,805kg
Rear wheel drive
● Test line up
- Measure components : O2, CO2, CO, NOx, SO2
- Auxiliary value : Exhaust gas temperature, Draught, Air temperature, Flow, Losses
- Test time : One time 30 minutes, total two time
● Test A
This test measures the component of the gas which the car emits in 2 minutes.
Tester measures the score in one cycle(4 times x 5 minutes).
Proceed by comparing the average value of every tested value.

Test measure 2 times out of 4 by installing O2 BAND and another 2 times by installing O2 BAND. This is to compare O2 BAND in most similar conditions.

This is to compare the difference before and after of O2 BAND installation in the most similar environment. (Continuous measurements)

The test compares two cycles (Test A, Test B).
Before and after and after and before the O2 BAND installation.

The test was based on a similar environment where the temperature/humidity had an error range of ±5%.
(Test method of cycle 1)
(Pre test steps)
① Equip the gas measuring device to the vehicle exhaust pipe.
- Tester blocks the exhaust pipe to prevent the air entering to the port while testing
② Set the gas measuring device (Fuel oil) and be ready.
(On test)
① Tester waited 1 minute after starting the engine.
② Gear setted at P, step on accelerator and keep it between 2500 and 3000 RPM for about 10 seconds.
③ Step on a full axel to maintain RPM 4000 (maximum) for 2 minutes. The gas measurement will calculate the same with number 3.
④ Turn off the engine
⑤ Keep it off for 4 minutes.
⑥ Repeat number 1 to 5 for once.
⑦ Repeat twice and install/remove the product (O2 BAND)
⑧ Repeat number 1 to 5 twice.
(End test)
· Test A_round 1
- Measurement date : 08/08/2023
- Air temperature : 36.1°C
- Atmospheric humidity : 50%
- Trip time : 15:29 ~ 17:52 KST
- Measurement method: O2 BAND unequipped. Continuous measured in 2 minutes 4 times with RPM 4000.
[A Round 1] Unequipped O2 BAND twice >>> Equipped twice
After O2 BAND equipped, CO 14.51% decreased, NOx 98.90% decreased, SO2 3.75% decreased.
[B round 1] O2 BAND Equipped twice >>> Unequipped twice
After unequip, CO 18.00% increased, NOx 7.30% increased, SO2 9.43% increased.
· Test A_round 2
- Measurement date : 08/09/2023 - Air temperature : 31.7°C - Atmospheric humidity : 69% - Trip time : 16:18 ~ 17:41 KST - Measurement method : O2 BAND unequipped. Continuously measured in 2 minutes 4 times with RPM 4000.
[A Round 2] Unequipped O2 BAND twice >>> Equipped twice
Equipped O2 BAND CO 19.81% decreased, NOx 26.06% decreased, SO2 0.00% no change.
[B Round 2] O2 BAND equipped twice >>> Unequipped twice
After unequip, CO 7.09% increased, NOx 199.88% increased, SO2 0.00% no change.
○ Result
· Changes after installing O2 BAND PRO_CO) CO has decreased by 14.51% in the first test A, in the second test A 19.81%. So the average measured to decrease about 17%. In the opposite way of the first and second B test, the measurement increased by 18% and 7.09%.

· Changes after installing the O2 BAND_NOx) NOx have decreased by 98.90% in the first test A and 26.06 have decreased in second A test. In the opposite way of first and second test B, the measurement increased by 7.3% and 199.88%.

· Change after installing O2 BAND_SO2) SO2 was decreased by 3.75% in the first test and 0.0% in the second A test in the vehicle's exhaust gas component. In the opposite test, round 1 B measured an increase of 153.84% and the second round B measured an increase of 0.00%

· Harmful exhaust gasses CO, NOx, SO2 measurement, CO changes about 15% by O2 BAND equipped/unequipped. NOx and SO2 were measured with a large variation of approximately 150%~200% depending whether or not the O2 BAND was installed.
Calculating average value seems meaningless on the test. But all three measurement components were measured to decrease when the O2 BAND was installed and increase when the O2 BAND was removed.

In conclusion, they were all measured in the same pattern.
● Test B
Tester tested five times (2 minutes) series in Maximum RPM 4000. The test goal is to analyze the components of the gas.
This test is focused on gathering average data more than Test A, depending on whether the O2 BAND is equipped or not.
The main purpose is to obtain quantitative data on exhaust gas components.

Tester measures the score in one cycle(5 times x 5 minutes).
Proceed by comparing the average value of every tested value.

The test compares two cycles (Test A, Test B).
Before and after, after and before the O2 BAND installation.

The test was based on a similar environment where the temperature/humidity had an error range of ±5%.
○ Test B (Cycle 1)
(Pre test stage)
① Equip the gas measuring device to the vehicle exhaust pipe.
- Tester blocks the exhaust pipe to prevent the air entering to the port while testing
② Set the gas measuring device (Fuel oil) and be ready.
(On test)
① Tester waited 1 minute after starting the engine.
② Gear setted at P and step on accelerator and keep it between 2500 and 3000 RPM for about 10 seconds.
③ Step on a full axel to maintain RPM 4000 (maximum) for 2 minutes. The gas measurement will calculate the same with number 3.
④ Idle car for 2 minutes and turn off the engine.
⑤ Keep it off for 4 minutes.
⑥ Repeat number 1 to 5 twice
(End test)
· Test B_round 1
- Measurement date : 08/17/2023 - Air temperature : 33.5°C - Atmospheric humidity : 56% - Trip time : A - 14:04 ~ 14:34 / B - 17:35 ~ 18:05 - Measurement method : O2 BAND unequipped. Continuously measured in 2 minutes 4 times with RPM 4000.
[A round 1] O2 BAND unequipped 5 times
[B round 1] O2 BAND equipped 5 times
[Variation]
O2 BAND equipped CO 23.26% decreased, NOx 46.72% decreased, SO2 0.00% no change.
· Test B_round 2
- Measurement date : 08/18/2023 - Air temperature : 34.5°C - Atmospheric humidity : 59% - Trip time : A - 14:41 ~ 15:11 / B - 18:08 ~ 18:38 - Measurement method :O2 BAND unequipped. Continuous measured in 2 minutes 5 times with RPM 4000.
[A round 2] O2 BAND unequipped 5 times [B round 2] O2 BAND equipped 5 times
[Variation]
After O2 BAND equipped CO 30.83% decreased, NOx 81.86% decreased, SO2 25.00% decreased.
· Test B_round 3
- Measurement date : 09/08/2023 - Air temperature : 30.7°C - Atmospheric humidity : 46% - Trip time : A - 17:02 ~ 18:02 / B - 18:07 ~ 18:46 - Measurement method : O2 BAND unequipped. Continuous measured in 2 minutes 5 times with RPM 4000.
[A round 3] O2 BAND equipped 5 times
[B round 3] O2 BAND unequipped 5 times
[Variation]
After O2 BAND equipped, CO 26.84% increased, NOx 7.11% increased, SO2 0.48% increased.
· Test B_round 4
- Measurement date : 09/11/2023 - Air temperature : 28.5°C - Atmospheric humidity : 64% - Trip time : A - 17:02 ~ 18:02 / B - 18:07 ~ 18:46 - Measurement method: Continuous measured in 2 minutes 5 times with RPM 4000.
[A round 4] O2 BAND unequipped 5 times
[B round 4] O2 BAND equipped 5 times
[Variation]
After O2 BAND equipped CO 8.98% decreased, NOx 98.51% decreased, SO2 85.18% decreased.
○ Result
· Change after installing O2 BAND_Co) CO has decreased by 23.26% in the first test, in the second test A 8.98%. So the average measured to decrease about 21%. In the opposite way of the 3 round test, the measurement increased by 26.84%.

· Change after installing O2 BAND_NOx) NOx has decreased by 46.72% in the first test, in the second test 81.86% and 98.51% on test 4. So the average measured to decrease about 75%.
In the opposite way of the 3 round test, the measurement increased by 7.11%.

· Change after installing O2 BAND_SO2) SO2 was not measured by 0% in the first test, in the second test 25% and 98.51% on test 4. In the opposite way of the 3 round test, the measurement increased by 7.11%.

· Harmful exhaust gasses CO, NOx, SO2 measurement, CO changes about 22% by O2 BAND equipped/unequipped. NOx and SO2 were measured with a large variation of approximately 0%~90% depending whether or not the O2 BAND was installed.

Calculating average value seems meaningless on the test. But same as test A all three measurement components were measured to decrease when the O2 BAND was installed and increase when the O2 BAND was removed.

In conclusion, they were all measured in the same pattern.
3. Diesel vehicle exhaust measurement inspection
MK-3000 cannot measure the exhaust gas level of diesel vehicles, the exhaust gas value of diesel vehicles was measured at an automobile inspection center located in pocheon, South Korea.
(Laboratory certified Automobile inspection method)
- Inspection method : Lug-Down3
- On the chassis dynamometer, the car’s accelerator pedal was set to maximum and selected mode 1, engine’s rated speed at 90% in mode 2 and 80% in mode 3 to measure exhaust density and engine output.
· As a result of measuring a diesel vehicle using the Lug- down3 without installed O2 BAND, mode 1: 22%, mode 2 13% and mode 3 10% was measured.
· After installing O2 BAND, average exhaust gas was decreased Mode 1: 15%, mode 2: 13 %, mode 3 %.
4. Engine vibration measurement test.
To measure the change in vibration value that occurs during the engine combustion due to measurement , a vibration meter was used depending whether or not the O2 BAND was installed.
● Test equipment
[Lutron VB-8205SD]
- Vibration meter (For measuring Speed, acceleration)
- Can measure RMS, Peak, Maximum value(Max), Hold value.
- Measuring range : Speed) 0.5 to 199.9 mm/s | Acceleration) 0.5 to 199.9 m/s2
- Accuracy : 23 ±5°C ~ indication value ±(5% +2d), 160Hz, 80Hz
- Zero point correction : Speed) 50 mm/s (160Hz) | Acceleration 50 m/s2 (160Hz)
- Frequency range : 10Hz ~ 1kHz
- Operating temperature and humidity : Under 0 ~ 50°C, 80% RH
● Test outline
Test unit : VEL mm/s (Unit that measures speed of vibration moving in millimeters per second)
● Test method
This test method was measured by installing a vibration meter on the engine with the "vehicle exhaust gas measurement".
● Test picture
● Test_ result
- Measurement date : A - 09/08/2023 | B - 09/12/2023
- Trip time : A - 17:22 ~ 18:45 / B - 14:25 ~ 15:44
- Measurement method : O2 BAND unequipped/equipped. Continuous measured in 2 minutes 5 times with 4000 RPM.
· Change after installing O2 BAND Test A. ( Attach/detach 5 times each total 10 times )vibration has increased by 40% in the first test, in the opposite way in the second test B measured approximately 27%. So the average measured to decrease about 21%.
In the opposite way of the 3 round test, the measurement increased by 26.84%.

· 34% of engine vibration value has changed depending on whether O2 BAND were equipped/unequipped. Although there were differences between each vehicle, we can check the engine vibration has improved when O2 BAND was installed.


O2 BAND: Creates high oxygen density and Co2 reduction. >